Finland-Helsinki-Seminar-Location-Kamp

It’s Life, but not as you know it…

OneLife, a specialist in cross-border life assurance solutions and digital, hosted its first life assurance seminar in Finland on 13 September. The seminar brought together more than 50 professionals and decision-makers from different asset management companies, private banks, leading law firms and family offices at the Hotel Kämp in central Helsinki.

Finland-Helsinki-Seminar-Location

The purpose of the seminar was to introduce and raise the awareness of OneLife as a leading Luxembourg-based provider and to outline our value proposition for Finnish partners and their clients.

OneLife’s predecessor companies have been providing top-class life insurance solutions for over 25 years from Luxembourg, but is still relatively unknown in Finland. At OneLife we feel that we have our place as a quality cross-border provider who does things differently. In addition to flexible, modern solutions, it is important to have the right people to service our partners and make administration as simple as possible. In Luxembourg, OneLife is recognised as a digital pioneer and we are already able to provide our partners with a tool-kit that adds real value for them and their clients. Watch this space in future months for more developments in the digital space!

There were both internal and external speakers at the event. Wim Dieryck, OneLife Chief Commercial Officer said a few words about the company and gave a demonstration of the OneLife OneApp to the audience. Tarja Valkeinen, Regional Sales Director Finland presented OneLife’s strong Finnish team, our products and services. Toni Kemi, Partner at Premium Group presented the added value of using an Insurance Agent and their range of services for both private clients and their advisers.

Finland-Helsinki-Seminar-September-

However, the focus of the seminar was on key developments and trends in the financial markets in Finland. The insight provided by our guest speakers from Aalto University School of Business was greatly valued by the audience. Assistant Professor Tomi Viitala, who is a member of the Finance Ministry’s taxation working group, talked about the possible taxation changes related to investment products including life insurance and investment funds. Professor Vesa Puttonen, on the other hand, insisted on the future need and role of Investment Advisers and came to the conclusion that as the market becomes more complex, the value of comprehensive investment advice is growing, not diminishing. According to him, Investment Advisers will be even more needed in the future than used to be the case.

 

Due to the success of the seminar, expect to see and hear more about OneLife in Finland!

Wish to know more about our solutions for Finnish clients?

Please contact on LinkedIn:   Tarja Valkeinen.

 

To find out about OneLife’s latest news and developments, please visit: www.onelife.com and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

 

OneLife-France-Investment-real-estate-luxembourg

Luxembourg life assurance as a solution for investment as the holding of assets in France

OneLife-France-Investment-real-estate-luxembourg

In a context of low interest rates and volatile financial markets, financial real-estate assets are an indispensable and preferred asset class for French investors or portfolio managers thanks to their projected financial returns and attractive valuations. 

Under the individualised financial management of a Luxembourg life-assurance policy, real-estate vehicles can be invested in by the discretionary manager of the dedicated internal fund or can be selected directly by the policyholder within the specialised insurance fund under conditions defined by the insurer in conformity with the internal insurance fund’s investment policy.

An investment decision motivated chiefly by prospects of returns and valuation must also take account of the tax treatment of real-estate income and capital gains earned under the aegis of the life-insurance policy, having regard to the fact that the assets are held cross-border. It should be borne in mind that the insurer owns the assets held under the life-assurance policy. The real-estate income earned within the internal insurance fund, whether dedicated or specialised, enjoys tax neutrality, but is subject to withholding tax.

Where investment is in French real-estate funds, the tax treatment of income and capital gains will depend on the legal form of the real-estate fund invested in, on the tax provisions in French law and under the double-taxation treaty that is applicable to income earned. Consideringthe complexity of the tax rules applicable depending on the fund’s legal form, seeking sound tax advice is recommended before investing.

The main French real-estate funds take the legal form of a Société Civile de Placement Immobilier (“SCPI” – real-estate investment trust) or of a Société à Prépondérance Immobilière à Capital Variable (“SPPICAV” – professional-investor real-estate-weighted open-end investment company).

From the income taxation standpoint

In the case of the fiscally-transparent SCPI, the result realised and attributed annually to a Luxembourg insurer in proportion to its investment are chargeable in France at a fixed rate of 33.33%. 

In the case of the SPPICAV, which is fiscally opaque, the results exempt from corporate income tax are distributed annually to the fund’s shareholders in the form of dividends in consistency with the legal status of an OPCI (real-estate investment scheme). Dividends paid to the Luxembourg insurer as shareholder will be chargeable to withholding tax in France at the double-tax treaty rate of 5% if the insurer holds more than 25% of the investment vehicle’s share capital, or 15% where the insurer’s shareholding is below that figure.

Withregard to the tax treatment of dividend payments from a real-estate fund, investing in and owning a SPPICAV under a Luxembourg life-assurance policy is therefore more favourable. 

From the capital gains taxation standpoint

Since the entry into force of a new amendment to the tax treaty between France and Luxembourg on 1 January 2017, capital gains arising on the disposal of shareholdings in French real-estate-weighted investment companies have become taxable in France.

Capital gains on disposals by non-resident legal entities will now be chargeable to the 33.33% fixed tax charge.

However, a distinction should be drawn between the sale of a shareholding in an SCPI and in a SPPICAV.

Capital gains on disposal of SCPI shares are taxable in France regardless of the size of the shareholding, whereas capital gains on the disposal of a shareholding in a SPPICAV are taxable in France only if the transferor holds more than 10% of the share capital.

Accordingly, investment in a SPPICAV enjoys more favourable tax treatment of capital gains on disposals when the insurer holds less than 10% of the share capital.

From the standpoint of welfare contributions

No welfare contributions are payable on real-estate income arising in France and received by the insurer in respect of the life-assurance policy’s assets.

A French-resident policyholder will be liable to pay welfare contributions on any proceeds from total or partial redemption.

Foreign investors, being non-French-resident, may prefer the investment solution using Luxembourg life assurance rather than direct investment in a French real-estate fund, in order to avoid paying welfare contributions on real-estate income.

From the standpoint of registration duty

In France, as a rule, registration duty is payable by the purchaser at the rate of 5% calculated on the purchase price of a shareholding in a real-estate-weighted investment vehicle.

However, concessional treatment applies to real-estate funds.

As concerns the SCPI, subscriptions, disposals and redemptions are exempted from registration duty except in the case of the privately-negotiated sale of a shareholding in a closed-end (fixed-capital) SCPI.

As concerns the SPPICAV, subscriptions, sales and redemptions are exempt from registration duty unless the purchaser holds more than 20% of the shares in the SPPICAV, or will do so following the purchase.

In conclusion, in order to safeguard the after-tax return on a real-estate investment, French or foreign investors using Luxembourg life assurance must, in addition to the expected return and risk, take account of the tax treatment of real-estate income, having regard to the nature of the fund and the French and treaty tax provisions.

OneLife boasts expertise in non-conventional assets, and remains available to its partners and clients in order to determine the most effective investment solution regarding local and cross-border tax constraints.

To learn more, please contact
LinkedIn_logo_Small Bastien PERRINE

LinkedIn_logo_Small Arnaud Mezergue

 

 

Article written by LinkedIn_logo_Small  Christophe BRECHIGNAC  – The content of this newsletter is governed by the limitations and  legal notice of OneLife’s website.

 

 

OneLife-Digital-Nicolas-Schmit-Minister

Why did the Minister Nicolas Schmit conclude OneLife’s Digital Days ?

OneLife-Digital-Nicolas-Schmit-Minister

 

On Thursday 15 June, at 6pm, OneLife had the honour to welcome Nicolas Schmit who delivered a speech to conclude OneLife’s Digital Days. The Minister emphasised by his presence and his words, the importance of the project initiated by OneLife within a global project of the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.  The objective of this project is to bridge the gap between the country’s digital transformation,  particularly in the financial sector, and the skills which are currently available.

 

Skills are an investment. We tend to think it’s just about computers and hardware but the best machines don’t function if people aren’t there to operate them.” Nicolas Schmit, Minister of Labour, Employment and Social Economy

 

These Digital Days marked the launch of the company’s general training programme for all employees via an integrated internal training platform to encourage the acquisition of the new skills necessary to support digital transformation, either individually or in groups. 

OneLife is therefore very grateful to Mr Nicolas Schmit for his participation and support and hopes to be able to further contribute to the cooperation initiatives proposed by the goverment between the private and public sectors to help achieve an effective digital transition.  « Together, we can achieve this goal ! »

 

Stayed tuned to discover more about OneLife’s Digital Days and what change they will bring to our company !

 

 

 

OneLife-Macron-Macronomics-french-economy-consequences

Post election relief, will Macronomics deliver?

OneLife-Macron-Macronomics-french-economy-consequences

 

This time round the pollsters didn’t get it wrong and Emmanuel Macron was indeed elected president of the French Republic on 7 May, as the markets had widely anticipated. Significant upswings had already taken place after Macron headed the first round results on 21 April, as well as following the no-holds-barred debate 3 May that left National Front candidate Marine Le Pen in disarray in the eyes of the French public.

As well as in France’s CAC40 index, the markets’ relief was evident in OAT spreads and the EUR/USD exchange rate. A fresh victory by the populists would have meant a serious possibility of a ‘Frexit’ referendum, and thus a renewed threat not only to the already fragile eurozone but the European Union as a whole. All these pessimistic thoughts seem to have dissipated.

As with ‘Trumponomics’, the markets seem to be weighing the likelihood or otherwise that the new president will ultimately be able to deliver on his ‘Macronomics’. A question mark will be the composition of Macron’s government, albeit a temporary one to hold the fort until the legislative elections to be held over two rounds on 11 and 18 June. For example, the designation as prime minister of Edouard Philippe, a long-time ally of centre-right presidential contender Alain Juppé, may influence the strength of Macron’s newly-renamed La République En Marche party during and after the elections.

 

Will the president attract more established right-wing or left-wing heavyweights? Or both, since he has positioned himself as embracing ideas from both sides of the political spectrum, rather than centrist predecessors in France that stressed their independence from either? If the decision of former Socialist premier Manuel Valls to rally to Macron is followed by further prominent political figures, the chances of Macron’s movement even obtaining an absolute majority will grow.

But even then, will he and his government be able to deliver real reforms? His two predecessors, Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande, never managed it despite their fairly comfortable parliamentary majorities. And investors are becoming impatient.

Philippe Brugère-Trélat, portfolio manager at Franklin Templeton Investments, says: “In our eyes, the chaotic French labour market in particular is ripe for reform. Unemployment is at unacceptably high levels, partly due to strict employment rules that make it difficult to shed staff. As a result, businesses are reluctant to take on new employees. To implement labour reforms, Macron is going to have to take on the unions and reduce their immense political power, which has been accumulated over decades of political infighting. Stiff resistance is to be expected, including some very noisy and visible national strikes. But we consider that a necessary step for the French economy. And if Macron is able to achieve success with labour reform, we could see operating margins in France rising, unemployment going lower and the overall prospects for GDP growth improving.”

 

” Macron is going to have to take on the unions and reduce their immense political power” 

 

His colleague Dylan Ball  of Templeton Global Equity Group adds: “The result could be positive for banking, insurance and potentially energy company stocks throughout Europe. On the other hand, Macron’s victory is likely to be less positive for companies we consider to be lower-growth. Additionally, the more defensive sectors of the equity market such as consumer staples could underperform, along with some telecommunication companies and utilities, where returns are heavily regulated.”


This view is not necessarily shared by all investors. Vincent Durel, European equity manager at Fidelity, sees potential for renewed consolidation in the telecoms sector if Macron, as he announced during his campaign, does indeed decide to reduce or sell completely the French state’s stake in Orange.

French company earnings in general could receive a 10% boost from Macron’s economic measures, which include fresh tax cuts and a plan to convert the current temporary reductions in social security charges into permanently lower rates. Plans to raise investment by €50 billion over five years would mainly benefit the energy, construction and IT sectors, he believes.

For bonds, Macron’s victory signals stability for now, according to Kenneth Orchard, global fixed-income portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price. He says: “French 10-year bonds were recently trading up 50 basis points over German 10-year bonds, but we expect spreads to tighten moderately, closer to last year’s average levels. After that, with France out of the picture as a political risk, the markets will focus on other issues, such as the Italian elections, where the anti-EU Five Star Movement is on course to become the biggest party, or possible upheaval in Spain if Catalunya presses ahead with its proposed independence referendum.”

However, Steven Andrew, macro fund manager at M&G Investments, begs to differ: “A disruption to the ‘euro fragmentation’ narrative should encourage investors to focus more on improving fundamental data across the region. Debt of peripheral sovereigns such as Portugal should benefit from a reduced fear of political instability.”

 

” They believe French yields could trend sideways or perhaps higher, based on eurozone growth” 

 

David Zahn, head of European fixed income at Franklin Templeton, observes: “We expected French government bonds to experience a further relief rally, although the victory was largely priced in after the first round. Once investors see past politics, there could be underperformance by French government bonds. They currently trade on a similar level with German bunds, yet they are not similar. France has a large current account deficit, a significant budget deficit and high debt to GDP.  In time, we think investors will realise that on fundamentals, French OATs should be trading much further out.

Brandywine Global, a subsidiary of Legg Mason, believes that safe-haven yields, like German bunds, Japanese government bonds and US Treasuries, will start to rise. They believe French yields could trend sideways or perhaps higher, based on eurozone growth and inflation expectations; manufacturing in the region, as measured by PMI reports, was strong

ahead of the election. If all things remain equal, Macron’s presidency should also pave the way for the ECB to taper asset purchases later this year, and overall pursue tighter monetary policies. Once the European election season is over, market and economic dynamics should no longer be held captive by political forces.

 

For more information, please contact our Investment Fund Services (IFS) expert:
LinkedIn_logo_Small Ruben Deroover

 

 

Portugal : a sunny jurisdiction for life assurance policyholders

The attraction of Portugal as a tourist destination is well known – its magnificent landscapes, cultural heritage and gastronomic delights have made the country a popular choice for holidaymakers for many years.

Hard hit by the European sovereign debt crisis, Portugal suffered a substantial economic downturn in 2011, resulting in a wave of austerity measures to restore the country’s financial stability. The country’s inhabitants were faced with high unemployment, a significant drop in income and increased healthcare costs.

In response to these problems, Portugal has succeeded in stabilising its finances, and growth has returned, although it’s still too early to talk about a genuine recovery of the country’s economy.

 

A holiday destination with a 10-year residence option

The Portuguese government has strengthened its tourism industry, reflected by the tertiary sector employing almost 65% of the working population. Furthermore, it has introduced fiscal measures to attract new residents, particularly retirees, including tax breaks on their pensions and offshore investments.

This attractive regime, combined with affordable property prices and a relatively low cost of living, has lured many European retirees to settle in Portugal and benefit from the Non-Habitual Resident status. They may continue to enjoy this status for 10 years.

To boost investment in the country, the government has also introduced a residence permit allocation scheme involving so-called ‘golden visas”, which are available to non-EU citizens that invest in property, create jobs or transfer part of their assets to Portugal.

 

An attractive jurisdiction for life assurance

Among the many asset management tools available to investors, life assurance offers various advantages, including an attractive fiscal regime thanks to the exemption from tax of capital gains earned on the financial assets underlying the contract. Owners of life assurance contracts can therefore manage the underlying funds without worrying about the tax impact of their transactions. Only in the event of withdrawals may taxation apply.

This is because withdrawals are subject to the ‘First In, First Out’ principle, whereby capital is redeemed first and any capital gains taken into account only afterwards. At this point gains are taxed on a flat-rate basis or according to a sliding scale depending on the system chosen by the taxpayer.

Another advantage of life assurance contracts from an income tax perspective is a tax reduction depending on the length of time the contract has been held. This reduction may be as high as 60% for term contracts, that last longer than 8 years.

These advantages are NOT offered by traditional investment portfolios, even for Non-Habitual Residents, who at most can obtain an exemption on interest and dividends if permitted by the double taxation avoidance treaty between Portugal and the country where the assets are located, e.g. in Luxembourg.

With regard to inheritance rights, all amounts invested in life assurance contracts are completely tax-free when the contract reaches maturity or when it is terminated by death of the insured person. They are also exempt from stamp duty on inheritances and legacies bequeathed to heirs other than the spouse, descendants and ascendants of the deceased.

 

The OneLife strategy with its new Wealth Portugal solution

With Portugal being a favoured location for many foreign nationals looking to relocate, notably – but not only – Brazilians, OneLife sees the importance and potential of the Portuguese market and has included it in its European development strategy.

In terms of financial diversification, the new Wealth Portugal solution allows policyholders to invest in a range of external funds, distributed by fund companies of international reputation, as well as in internal funds. The internal funds may be collective funds available to all OneLife policyholders or dedicated funds tailored to match the policyholder’s investor profile.

External and internal collective funds with daily valuation may also be accompanied by automatic investment options such as the “Stop Loss”, “Save Gains” or “Drip Feeding” mechanisms, giving policyholders tools to react swiftly to market developments. These investment options may be activated or deactivated at any time during the lifetime of the contract.

Depending on the policyholders’ investment strategy, they may consider a dedicated fund with discretionary management entrusted to an investment manager of their choice or should policyholders be interested in selecting the investments themselves with a view to a long-term holding, there is the option to invest in a specialised insurance fund.

The flexibility of Wealth Portugal makes it possible to include any of the fund types mentioned above at the same time and even to hold several in the same category, provided that the investment limits imposed by the Luxembourg Commissariat aux Assurances are respected.

Policyholders of a Wealth Portugal contract have the option to select an additional death cover. If there are two or more insured persons, a choice of first or last death basis is also available. Furthermore, the product allows policyholders to designate the beneficiaries that best suit their needs. In addition to this, there is the added benefit of a succession planning mechanism. The contractual rights may be passed on to the surviving Policyholder(s) or to any other third party designated by the Policyholder(s), where a policyholder dies before the insured person.

 

LinkedIn_logo_Small Valérie Vaes, Senior Wealth Planner

LinkedIn_logo_Small Andre Piovezan, Regional Sales Director

 

>>> For more information on our new Wealth Portugal solution, please contact our specialist Andre Piovezan at: andre.piovezan@onelife.com

>>> This article is part of the November 2016 edition of our monthly newsletter Life Insights. Click here to subscribe.

 

Do stop-loss limits protect or destroy performance?

As we know, most investors do not really perceive risk in portfolios as symmetrical. A scientific approach would state the risk of a portfolio in terms of volatility – the likelihood that actual returns may deviate from expectation, and the potential scale of that difference. That measure works in both directions, up and down, so a portfolio delivering a performance 20% higher than expected for a given period will be categorised as high risk – the kind of risk a client is delighted to accept. But if the portfolio had an expected return of 5% and came out 20% lower, the client would be unhappy about basically the same level of risk.

Therefore various techniques have been developed over the years to respond in an asymmetrical way whenever a portfolio’s performance deviates too much on the downside. Best-known – and familiar to our clients – are so-called stop-loss limits that trigger the sale of certain assets once their negative performance over a specific period reaches pre-established thresholds.

This approach gives investors a feeling of security, since they know they will never lose much more than the predetermined maximum drawdown that triggers the stop-loss sale of the risky asset. This perceived safety net can therefore help convince traditional fixed-income investors, especially in today’s negative yield environment, to consider broadening their horizons and accepting a little more (equity) risk in their portfolios.

 

10.11.2016-PIC-StopLoss

Does that approach actually work in times of crisis?

It certainly has worked on a couple of occasions in the not so distant past. Take an investment in the Euro Stoxx 50 Index with a predetermined stop-loss level of 15%. Since the turn of the century, there have been two clear occasions where a lot of damage would have been avoided by selling up after a 15% drawdown: in the 2000-01 dot-com bubble crash and the 2008-09 subprime-induced financial crisis. During both periods the Euro Stoxx 50 dropped massively, by 66% and 61% respectively. In these scenarios taking a 15% hit and quitting would have been preferable to hanging on until the market turned.

But since then stock markets seem to have fundamentally changed, with no fewer than seven “mini-crises” since 2009 in which markets have fallen by more than 15%: 19% in 2010, 37% in 2011, 21% in 2012, 16% in 2014, 22% in 2015, and 24% and then 16% this year. Pulling out of the market after every 15% drop would have caused a series of 15% losses rather than a protected return, even though over this period as a whole the market did not lose money.

The biggest problem is the same in both cases: how do you time market re-entry? Starting to reinvest partially straightaway after a stop-loss is a bit of a nonsense: you might as well stay in if you expect a rebound. But waiting for a fixed period of time, such as 12 months, before re-entering the market would not have helped even in the longer crises of 2000-01 and 2008-09, both occasions when the 15% stop-loss would have been triggered a second time. And since then most re-entries would have put you back in the market just in time for the next mini-crisis.

 

The conclusion: stop-losses are not the perfect answer to all market volatility issues. They may give a secure feeling, and they will avoid the worst in a really massive downturn, but there is a big likelihood of losing out on performance over the long run by quitting the markets too often, as has been the case over the past seven years. Better portfolio diversification, even outside the traditional equities and cash/bonds mix, might prove better at keeping price swings within your comfort zone and avoiding being hit by the “saloon doors” of the next downturn swinging back at you.

 

Ruben De Roover
OneLife Investment Relationship Manager
LinkedIn_logo_Small  https://lu.linkedin.com/in/ruben-de-roover 

 

>>> For more information on the underlying assets available within our life assurance contracts, please contact our Investment specialists here.

>>> This article is part of the September 2016 edition of our monthly newsletter Life Insights. Click below to subscribe.

 

Copyright picture: Stop Loss, Trading (credit: Istock)